Skip to main content
· 4/20/1948

Bishop v. Cushing

Citations

  • 334 Ill. App. 263
  • 78 N.E.2d 837
  • 1948 Ill. App. LEXIS 524

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \requested that the Milsteins be permanently enjoined from ... (3) voting any shares of GAF stock acquired during the conspiracy\
  • “We have already held that an issuer has standing to assert violation of section 14(a), governing proxy contests[.]”
  • appeal from denial of injunctory relief in the context of a proxy contest for control
  • “[T]he purpose of section 13(d) is to alert the marketplace to every large, rapid aggregation or accumulation of securities, regardless of technique employed, which might represent a potential shift in corporate control.... ”
  • “the purpose of section 13(d) is to alert the marketplace to large, rapid aggregation or accumulation of securities, regardless of technique employed, which might represent a potential shift in corporate control”
  • “This same reasoning is just as meaningful in the framework of section 13(d), and accordingly, we are chary of finding that GAF, based on the allegations before us, had standing under Rule 10b-5.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bristow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.