Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 3/30/1967
Bishop v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 225 N.E.2d 345
- 352 Mass. 258
- 1967 Mass. LEXIS 791
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- single justice reserved and reported petition under G. L. c. 211, § 3, without decision
- considering right to speedy trial where motion to dismiss based on art. 11 of Declaration of Rights of Constitution of Commonwealth
- rule promulgated in District of Columbia Circuit: six months’ delays are “properly subject to inquiry and need for justification”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wilkins, Whittemore, Cutter, Kirk, Spiegel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. GoveMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1974-11-13· cited 111×
- Rubin F. Needel v. Palmer C. Scafati, SuperintendentFirst Circuit· 1969-10-13· cited 54×
- Commonwealth v. GreenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1968-02-28· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. MarshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1968-11-29· cited 29×
- Esteves v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2001-04-25· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. LauriaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1971-04-02· cited 14×
- Needel v. ScafatiD. Massachusetts· 1968-09-13· cited 7×
- Turner v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1996-08-16· cited 2×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.