Bishop v. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• attack by Bishop on Iowa’s advertising rules that were drafted with the intent to conform with the holding in Bates v. State Bar of Arizona, 433 U.S. 350, 97 S.Ct. 2691, 53 L.Ed.2d 810 (1977)
• attack by Bishop on Iowa's advertising rules that were drafted with the intent to conform with the holding in Bates v. State Bar of Arizona, 433 U.S. 350, 97 S.Ct. 2691, 53 L.Ed.2d 810 (1977)
• “dignified,” as used in advertising, held not unconstitutionally vague

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).