Bishop v. Bishop

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that meeting the minimum requirements of a change of income set forth in the statute simply entitles a party to file a petition with the court requesting a modification of its child-support obligation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Curtis Lumber Co., Inc. v. Louisiana Pacific Corp.
  Eighth Circuit· 2010-08-24· cited 73×
• T & S Machine Shop, Inc. v. KD Sales
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2009-12-09· cited 4×
• Thompson Maner v. Kathryn Maner
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2021-12-01· cited 2×
• Guffey v. Counts
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2009-03-11
• Adam White v. Megan Merrigan
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2024-04-17

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Vick v. Shinn
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1886-11-15· cited 20×
• Vandiver v. Banks
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1998-03-19· cited 19×
• Hunt v. Hunt
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2000-04-27· cited 17×
• Schumacher v. Schumacher
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1999-03-17· cited 16×
• Heflin v. Heflin Bell
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1996-03-06· cited 14×
• Guest v. San Pedro
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2000-06-07· cited 11×
• Weiss v. Chavers
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2004-06-03· cited 5×
• Kibler v. Kibler
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1989-03-15· cited 2×