Bishop v. Bartlett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, to establish standing, a plaintiff must have “(1) suffered an injury in fact that is (a) concrete and particularized and (b) actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical, (2) fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant,” and (3
• “[WJhen the asserted harm is a ‘generalized grievance’ shared in substantially equal measure by all or a large class of citizens, that harm alone normally does not warrant exercise of jurisdiction.”
• a party lacks standing when its interest is “merely a claim of the right, possessed by every citizen, to require that the government be administered according to law”
• to show standing a plaintiff must show that it suffered an injury- in-fact that is concrete and particularized, and actual or imminent, fairly traceable to the challenged action of Securus and likely to be redressed by a favorable decision of the Court
• discussing constitutional and prudential components of standing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).