Bishop, Jason Brent

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the FCRA is ambiguous thus did not unequivocally waive sovereign immunity
• holding that, when construing the FCRA as a whole, the statute is “ambiguous with respect to whether Congress waived immunity” and noting that reading “person” to include the federal government would lead to unusual results
• holding that, when construing the FCRA as a whole, the statute is “ambiguous with respect to whether Congress waived immunity” and noting that reading “person” to include the federal government would lead to unusual results
• holding that federal agencies are immune from lawsuits under the FCRA
• holding threadbare and “naked assertions 9 fail our edict that a plaintiff may not rely on a bare legal conclusion to assert injury-in-fact[.]”
• holding FCRA does not waive sovereign immunity to bring suit against the National Park Service

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).