Skip to main content
· 7/2/1996

Bishop Creek Lodge v. Scira

Citations

  • 46 Cal. App. 4th 1721
  • 54 Cal. Rptr. 2d 745
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 8130
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5032
  • 1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 648

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • constructive notice of the facts from public records is no defense to fraud
  • “[A] fraud plaintiff does not have the ‘duty of inquiry’ that a purchaser of real property does. The fraud plaintiff need only demonstrate justifiable reliance; this is a different, and far lower, standard.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richli

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.