Bisetti v. United Refrigeration Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• factor of \foreseeability of harm\ is extremely remote, given the illegal nature of plaintiff's activities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Martinez v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n
  California Court of Appeal· 2000-08-01· cited 31×
• Mora v. Baker Commodities, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1989-05-17· cited 26×
• Resolution Trust Corp. v. Rossmoor Corp.
  California Court of Appeal· 1995-04-21· cited 18×
• Laico v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2004-10-27· cited 16×
• Medina v. Hillshore Partners
  California Court of Appeal· 1995-11-21· cited 16×
• Ronald Roy Henderson v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1987-09-04

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rowland v. Christian
  California Supreme Court· 1968-08-08· cited 1,329×
• Ray v. Alad Corp.
  California Supreme Court· 1977-02-24· cited 396×
• Uccello v. Laudenslayer
  California Court of Appeal· 1975-01-14· cited 147×
• Baldwin v. Zoradi
  California Court of Appeal· 1981-08-31· cited 53×
• Mark v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
  California Supreme Court· 1972-05-17· cited 51×
• Goodman v. Harris
  California Supreme Court· 1953-02-17· cited 29×
• Buehler v. Oregon-Washington Plywood Corp.
  California Supreme Court· 1976-07-12· cited 27×
• Schwartz v. McGraw-Edison Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1971-01-27· cited 25×
• Rosales v. Stewart
  California Court of Appeal· 1980-12-11· cited 21×
• Anaya v. Turk
  California Court of Appeal· 1984-02-16· cited 16×
• City of Los Angeles v. City of Artesia
  California Court of Appeal· 1977-08-25· cited 15×
• Alva v. Cook
  California Court of Appeal· 1975-07-15· cited 12×