· 6/18/1998
Birrell v. Indiana Auto Sales & Repair
Citations
- 698 N.E.2d 6
- 38 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 247
- 1998 Ind. App. LEXIS 950
- 1998 WL 328511
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the court in which a case is first instituted has exclusive jurisdiction over the case and that, once a court has acquired exclusive jurisdiction over a case, the case is pending in that court within the meaning of Trial Rule 12(B)(8)
- applying the doctrine and determining a principal could not be held vicariously liable for a delegee’s reckless conduct because, although the plaintiff identified a statutory duty, there was no violation of that duty
- a creditor cannot use threats, enter a residence without debtor’s consent and cannot seize property over a debtor’s objections
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bailey, Najam, Riley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.