Skip to main content
· 6/18/1998

Birrell v. Indiana Auto Sales & Repair

Citations

  • 698 N.E.2d 6
  • 38 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 247
  • 1998 Ind. App. LEXIS 950
  • 1998 WL 328511

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the court in which a case is first instituted has exclusive jurisdiction over the case and that, once a court has acquired exclusive jurisdiction over a case, the case is pending in that court within the meaning of Trial Rule 12(B)(8)
  • applying the doctrine and determining a principal could not be held vicariously liable for a delegee’s reckless conduct because, although the plaintiff identified a statutory duty, there was no violation of that duty
  • a creditor cannot use threats, enter a residence without debtor’s consent and cannot seize property over a debtor’s objections

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bailey, Najam, Riley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.