Skip to main content
· 1/19/2016

Biros v. Kane

Citations

  • 136 S. Ct. 922
  • 193 L. Ed. 2d 786
  • 2016 WL 207242

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “As the underlying action has been decided against the appellants, this collateral discovery dispute is now moot.”
  • “That appellants have appealed the adverse state court ruling does not suffice to keep this collateral proceeding alive as ‘there is no longer a trial proceeding in aid of which a subpoena for a discovery deposition may issue.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.