Biro v. Matz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘‘[l]ong a staple of our statutory interpretation, this court also has applied the principle [of expressio unius est exclusio alterius] to contractual agreements’’
• “Because the sellers in the present case are not in the business of selling real property, CUTPA is inapplicable to the transaction in this case.”
• “Because the sellers in the present case are not in the business of selling real property, CUTPA is inapplicable to the transaction in this case.”
• sellers not in business of selling real property and therefore CUTPA inapplicable to transaction
• to analyze effect of contract provisions, contract must be construed as a whole

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).