Birmingham v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that an indirect subsidiary is a subsidiary “separated from the parent by one or more levels of intermediate subsidiaries.”
• affirming grant of summary judgment to defendant on issue of willfulness because there was “no evidence that [defendant’s] specific actions with respect to [plaintiff] were reckless”
• affirming summary judgment where plaintiff “pointed to no described practice that would be a reckless violation of the FCRA”
• finding no liability “because of the absence of evidence of intentional or reckless misconduct”
• reliance on Rule 19 to amend to join a “required” Defendant is a “fundamental misunderstanding” of its purpose
• “A ‘willful’ violation is either an intentional violation or a violation committed . . . in reckless disregard of its duties under the FCRA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).