Skip to main content
· 11/15/1903

Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. Bynum

Citations

  • 139 Ala. 389

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that time-bar under section 2501 implicates a failure to state a claim, not a lack of subject-matter jurisdiction
  • “Any doubt that a successful staleness defense results in a dismissal on the merits has been resolved by Spruill.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haralson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.