Birl v. Wallis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \it is well established that a patient must be unconditionally released from involuntary confinement once the grounds for initial confinement cease to exist\
• “it is well established that a patient must be unconditionally released from involuntary confinement once the grounds for initial confinement cease to exist”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wyatt v. King
  M.D. Alabama· 1991-07-22· cited 11×
• WYATT BY AND THROUGH RAWLINS v. King
  M.D. Alabama· 1993-01-12· cited 8×
• Birl v. Wallis
  M.D. Alabama· 1986-07-24· cited 5×
• Schell v. STATE DEPT. OF MENTAL HEALTH
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1992-08-28· cited 3×
• Harkey v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1989-06-30· cited 3×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mathews v. Eldridge
  Supreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
• Addington v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 1979-04-30· cited 3,004×
• O'Connor v. Donaldson
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-26· cited 1,231×
• Lynch v. Baxley
  M.D. Alabama· 1974-12-14· cited 207×
• United States v. Claude Raymond Curry
  Fourth Circuit· 1969-06-09· cited 28×
• United States v. Vito Debellis
  First Circuit· 1981-04-21· cited 17×
• Birl v. Wallis
  M.D. Alabama· 1985-09-04· cited 8×