Birkholm v. Washington Mutual Bank, F.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to dismiss CPA claim even though 2 plaintiff’s “argument that the conduct at issue in this case affects the public interest because the 3 conduct is capable of repetition is weak at best”
• “The burden of demonstrating Congressional intent to create an implied right of action lies with the party asserting an implied right of action.” (citing Suter v. Artist M., 503 U.S. 347, 363-64, 112 S. Ct. 1360, 118 L. Ed. 2d 1 (1992))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).