· 2/25/1998
Birdsell v. Fort McDowell Sand & Gravel (In Re Sanner)
Citations
- 218 B.R. 941
- 1998 Bankr. LEXIS 648
- 32 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 359
- 1998 WL 112524
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that an agreement by which one party will not bid at auction presents a question of fact for a jury as to whether the intent behind the agreement was to influence the price at auction
- an agreement not to compete creates a triable issue as to the intent of the agreement
- “A recital of a fact in an integrated agreement may be shown to be untrue.”
- majority of jurisdictions permit contracting parties to prove date of the agreement where so doing would not alter a vital part of the contract
- agreeing Arizona law is well 5 established
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Charles G. Case
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.