Skip to main content
· 2/25/1998

Birdsell v. Fort McDowell Sand & Gravel (In Re Sanner)

Citations

  • 218 B.R. 941
  • 1998 Bankr. LEXIS 648
  • 32 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 359
  • 1998 WL 112524

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that an agreement by which one party will not bid at auction presents a question of fact for a jury as to whether the intent behind the agreement was to influence the price at auction
  • an agreement not to compete creates a triable issue as to the intent of the agreement
  • “A recital of a fact in an integrated agreement may be shown to be untrue.”
  • majority of jurisdictions permit contracting parties to prove date of the agreement where so doing would not alter a vital part of the contract
  • agreeing Arizona law is well 5 established

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Charles G. Case

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.