Birdsall Ex Rel. Estate of Birdsall v. Tulloch (In Re Tulloch)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that due to defendant’s substantial participation in the case, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts would deem those issues decided by the state court to have been “actually litigated” for issue preclusion purposes
• “Exception-to-discharge adversary proceedings are ‘core proceedings’ arising under title 11 and, as such, bankruptcy judges may ‘hear and determine’ such matters and ‘enter appropriate orders and judgments’ therein.”
• “Exception-to-diseharge adversary proceedings are ‘core proceedings’ arising under title 11 and, as such, bankruptcy judges may ‘hear and determine’ such matters and ‘enter appropriate orders and judgments’ therein.”
• absent an overriding precept, a state court judgment is given the same effect in bankruptcy court as it would be given in the jurisdiction which issued the judgment
• absent an overriding precept, a state court judgment is to be given the same effect in bankruptcy court as it would be given in the jurisdiction which issued the judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).