Skip to main content
· 2/21/1908

Bird v. People's Gas & Electric Light Co.

Citations

  • 158 F. 903
  • 16 Ohio F. Dec. 100
  • 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4980

Syllabus

<p>1. Corporations — Appointment op a Receiver pok an Electric Light Company-Grounds.</p> <p>Upon, a bill for the appointment of a receiver, for the benefit of all concerned, filed by a bondholder, alleging that the light company had defaulted in the payment of interest for two periods; that default had been made in the payment of all taxes lawfully levied upon the company’s property and franchises; that it had permitted part of its property to be sold for such taxes; that the company was hopelessly insolvent, and unable to pay its present and accruing indebtedness; that, by reason thereof, its franchises and contracts were in danger of being forfeited; that its funds had been unlawfully diverted by its officers to their own uses; that said officers had suffered- collusive judgments to be taken against the company; that the proceeds of its bonds had been appropriated by its promoters under cover of the Western Gas & Investment Company which owned practically all of its stock, and which operated the mortgagor company; that a large part of its income had been similarly appropriated, thereby preventing the company from meeting its obligations; that said Western Gas & Investment Company and the defendant company with other operating companies were organized in furtherance and for the purpose of defrauding investors in their bonds; and that the trustees, who were residents and citizens of the state of Illinois, and not within the jurisdiction of this Court, had failed to exercise the powers granted to them for the protection of the bondholders — held, that a case was made for the appointment of a receiver.'</p> <p>2. Same.</p> <p>Upon a bill for foreclosure and the appointment or extension of a receiver, as provided in the mortgage deed for the same company filed by the trustees of the mortgage six months later, held, that the receiver who had . been appointed acted’ for neither party, but for the court, and for that reason the motion of the trustees for the appointment

Judges: Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.