Bird v. Bird

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[The] question of making a nominal award for the purpose of retaining jurisdiction to deal with future possibilities is one which ... is committed to the sound judicial discretion of the trial judge.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hansen v. Hansen
  California Court of Appeal· 1965-04-14· cited 20×
• Grenall v. Grenall
  California Court of Appeal· 1959-04-21· cited 8×
• Bongiovanni v. Rackow
  California Court of Appeal· 1963-01-31· cited 5×
• Alcalay v. Alcalay
  California Court of Appeal· 1962-03-01· cited 3×
• Bird v. Bird
  California Court of Appeal· 1960-04-21· cited 2×
• Harden v. Taylor
  California Court of Appeal· 1962-08-02

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Nichols v. Mitchell
  California Supreme Court· 1948-09-23· cited 147×
• Richard v. Richard
  California Court of Appeal· 1954-03-17· cited 32×
• Sonkin v. Hershon
  California Court of Appeal· 1955-01-27· cited 14×
• Walsh v. Walsh
  California Court of Appeal· 1952-01-08· cited 14×
• Gillespie v. Gillespie
  California Court of Appeal· 1953-11-04· cited 13×
• Farnsworth v. Farnsworth
  California Court of Appeal· 1947-09-03· cited 7×