Bird & Sons, Inc. v. The United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the Tucker Act does not preclude relief’ for a claim alleging a negligent act in breach of a contractually-created duty
• concluding that “where an alleged ‘negligent act’ constitutes a breach of a contractually created duty, the Tucker Act does not preclude relief’
• recognizing jurisdiction where “ ‘loss resulted from the negligent manner in which defendant performed its contract’ ”
• “where an alleged 'negligent act’ constitutes a breach of a contractually created duty, the Tucker Act does not preclude relief”
• “[W]here an alleged ‘negligent’ act constitutes a breach of a contractually created duty, the Tucker Act does not preclude relief.”
• “[W]here an alleged ‘negligent’ act constitutes a breach of a contractually created duty, the Tucker Act does not preclude relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).