Bird Peak Corp. v. Lawyers Title Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the plaintiff “had the opportunity to raise—and did raise—her fraud allegations in the state fore- closure proceeding, where the court rejected them.”
• stating that Rooker-Feldman bars “asking a federal district court to review and reject the state court's judgment of foreclosure of [plaintiff’s] property”
• stating that “allegations of fraud and conspiracy” surrounding the foreclosure proceedings are barred
• “[A] request for review of a state-court foreclosure decision that includes a claim for damages based on charges of defrauding the state court does not elude Rooker–Feldman.”
• Rooker-Feldman bars “asking a federal district court to review and reject the state court's judgment of foreclosure of [plaintiff's] property. Taylor v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n, 374 F.3d 529, 533 (7th Cir. 2004)
• Rooker-Feldman prevented federal court from hearing claims alleging injury from state-court foreclosure judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).