Biometric Affiliated Research Laboratories, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that deposition was warranted because attorneys’ participation in disputed events was focus of litigation
• “There is no general prohibition against obtaining the deposition of adverse counsel regarding relevant, non-privileged information.”
• “The importance and degree of uniqueness of [counsel’s] information outweighs the potential negative impact upon the attorney-client relationship and the adversary process.”
• no general rule prohibiting the deposition of opposing counsel regarding relevant, non-privileged information
• depositions limited to one day per witness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).