Bioderm Skin Care, LLC and Quan Nguyen, M.D. v. Veasna \sandee\ Sok

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “broad language of the Medical Liability Act evinces legislative intent for the statute to have expansive application”
• ordering dismissal of claims arising out of allegedly improper laser hair removal because they were health care liability claims and no expert report had been filed
• ordering dismissal of claims arising out of allegedly improper laser hair removal because they were health care liability claims and no expert report had been filed
• remanding for the trial court to dismiss the case and award attorney’s fees and costs where plaintiff did not serve an expert report because plaintiff thought the claim was not an HCLC
• remanding for the trial court to dismiss the case and award attorney’s fees and costs where plaintiff did not serve an expert report because plaintiff thought the claim was not an HCLC
• “Because Bioderm is an affiliate of a physician, we conclude it is a health care provider under the Medical Liability Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).