Bio-Med Plus v. STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “it is not enough for the [emergency suspension order] merely to allege statutory violations,” the allegations of continuing harm must be “particularized,” not “general and conclusory” or related to stale actions
• quashing emergency suspension order which lacked any factual allegations showing immediate danger to public health, safety, or welfare, despite pendency of a federal indictment against target of the order
• “Where, as here, no hearing was held prior to the entry of the emergency order, every element necessary to its validity must appear on the face of the order.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).