Binti Watts and Christopher Pryor v. County of Sacramento, a Municipal Corporation Lorie Timberlake Bryan Munn Donald Black and Jeffrey Morace

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• collecting cases and concluding that courts \have generally required substantial evidence pointing to the suspect's co-resident status to create a reasonable belief that he lives in the home of a third party\
• collecting cases and concluding that courts “have generally required substantial evidence pointing to the suspect’s co-resident status to create a reasonable belief that he lives in the home of a third party”
• “Courts have generally required substantial evidence pointing to the suspect’s co-resident status to create a reasonable belief that he lives in the home of a third party.”
• “Courts have generally required substantial evi- dence pointing to the suspect’s co-resident status to create a reasonable belief that he lives in the home of a third party.”
• under California law, false arrest and false imprisonment are not separate torts; instead, a 15 false arrest is considered a way to commit false imprisonment
• “A cause of action 11 for false imprisonment based on unlawful arrest will lie where there was an arrest 12 without process followed by imprisonment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).