Binladen Bsb Landscaping v. M v. \Nedlloyd Rotterdam\, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc., Nedlloyd Lijnen B v. (Nedlloyd Lines)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the burden was satisfied where the bill of lading incorporated COGSA and provided space for declaring excess value
• “[T]he touchstone of our analysis should be the contractual agreement between the parties, as set forth in the bill of lading.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).