Bingham v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the considerations of fairness to parties, trial convenience, and efficient administration of justice all weigh in favor of it declining to sever the claims against both sets of defendants”
• Rule 21 “provides federal courts with the discretion to drop non-diverse parties in order to achieve complete diversity, as long as that party is not indispensable under Rule 19 ....”
• joinder held proper because medical malpractice and product liability claims all related to the plaintiff’s use of acetaminophen, her subsequent injuries, and the alleged failure to warn of the risks of ingesting the drug

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).