Skip to main content
· 12/29/1989

Bingham v. Idaho Department of Transportation

Citations

  • 786 P.2d 538
  • 117 Idaho 147
  • 1989 Ida. LEXIS 162

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • even though they involve an element of choice, no discretionary immunity accorded decisions regarding the placement of street signs and the determination of speed limits since such decisions merely implement Department policy as set forth in the MUTCD
  • even though they involve an element of choice, no discretionary immunity accorded decisions regarding the placement of street signs and the determination of speed limits since such decisions merely implement Department policy as set forth in the MUTCD

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bistline, Johnson, McQuade, Boyle, Shepard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.