Bing Feng Chen v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that the decision of the Plan Administrator is final, unless the claimant proves that the decision to deny benefits under the Plan amounted to “an abuse of its fiduciary discretion”
• noting that court “may receive and consider any relevant evidence” at suppression hearing
• noting appointment of an expert under Rule 706 may be appropriate in a case involving an indigent plaintiff “to avoid a wholly one-sided presentation of opinion[] on [a medical] issue”
• “[W]e join eight of our sister circuits in ruling that the Board ... may simply state that it affirms the IJ’s decision for the reasons set forth in that decision.”
• “[W]e join eight of our sister circuits in ruling that the Board ... may simply state that it affirms the IJ’s decision for the reasons set forth in that decision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).