Binford v. First Magnus Financial Corp. (In Re First Magnus Financial Corp.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “both parts of the subsections must exist in order for a claimant to be entitled to an administrative expense”
• affirming the dismissal of a WARN Act adversary proceeding with a putative class of over 5,000 members because “the normal bankruptcy claims procedure was adequate to handle the claims”
• affirming the dismissal of a WARN Act adversary proceeding with a putative class of over 5,000 members because “the normal bankruptcy claims procedure was adequate to handle the claims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).