Bilsky v. Bilsky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, in interpreting “issue” used in a will executed in 1955, “[fjerms such as bodily heirs, issue, etc. have long been defined in the law, and the definition does not include adopted children”
• in interpreting “issue” used in a will executed in 1955, court observed that “[t]erms such as bodily heirs, issue, etc. have long been defined in the law, and the definition does not include adopted children”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sides v. Beene
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1997-02-24· cited 6×
• Brown v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2003-02-19

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Davis v. Davis
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1951-12-03· cited 12×
• Crittenden v. Lytle
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1952-12-08· cited 11×