Bils v. Nixon, Hargrave, Devans & Doyle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Arizona had jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants that improperly provided, obtained, and used the credit report of an Arizona resident
• finding Arizona jurisdiction appropriate over a New York defendant who allegedly invaded the privacy of an Arizona resident by violating the FCRA
• “the only place an ‘event’ can occur constituting a violation of [an Arizona resident’s] right to privacy is Arizona.”
• dispute concerning purpose about credit inquiries created substantive, rather than jurisdictional, factual issue which is to be left to the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).