Bilodeau v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• coverage “for bodily injury” conceded to include loss of consortium claim which flowed from bodily injury
• Court did not look at policy language as used in plain and ordinary sense, as Oklahoma law requires
• a loss of consortium claimant is an “injured person” under the terms of the policy
• the phrase “injured person” included a loss-of-consortium claimant and the loss-of-consortium claimant must be considered a separate person from the bodily-injured person
• policy will be interpreted according to “fair meaning of the language used, as applied to the subject matter”
• policy will be interpreted according to “fair meaning of the language used, as applied to the subject matter”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).