Skip to main content
· 9/11/2015

Billy Schumann v. Collier Anesthesia, P.A.

Citations

  • 803 F.3d 1199
  • 25 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 537
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 16194
  • 2015 WL 5297260

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding to the district court to give it the first oppor- tunity to apply a newly adopted legal rule
  • remanding to the district court to give it the first oppor- tunity to apply a newly adopted legal rule
  • remanding after this Court adopted a new legal test “[t]o allow the district court to apply this test in the first instance and, if the district court desires, to give the parties an opportunity to further develop the record to address the components of the test”
  • remanding after this Court adopted a new legal test “[t]o allow the district court to apply this test in the first instance and, if the district court desires, to give the parties an opportunity to further develop the record to address the components of the test”
  • \[T]he mere fact that an employer obtains a benefit from providing a clinical [program] does not mean that the employer is the 'primary beneficiary' of the relationship.\
  • “As part of this consideration, the court should also evaluate the extent to which the nature of the training requires the daily schedule that the intern must endure.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin, Rosenbaum, Proctor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.