Billy & Leo, LLC v. Michaelidis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• although buyer offered proof of loan approval and cash deposits, all of them were obtained after date specified in contract and did not total full price

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bell Ex Rel. Albert R. Bell Living Trust v. Rotwein
  District of Columbia· 2008-03-05· cited 10×
• Intercity Development, LLC v. Andrade
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2006-07-25· cited 10×
• Jacob v. Dometic Origo AB
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2007-03-20· cited 8×
• Beckenstein v. Reid and Riege, PC
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-03-31· cited 6×
• Jaramillo v. Case
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2007-05-01· cited 5×
• Wahba v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2020-10-20· cited 5×
• KDM Services, LLC v. DRVN Enterprises, Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2022-03-08· cited 4×
• Gonzales v. Langdon
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2015-12-01

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• John T. Brady & Co. v. City of Stamford
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-11-19· cited 38×
• Niehaus v. Cowles Business Media, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-04-22· cited 31×
• Franc v. Bethel Holding Co.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2002-10-22· cited 28×
• Steiner v. Bran Park Associates
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-11-13· cited 17×
• In re Lori Beth D.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1990-04-10· cited 6×