Skip to main content
· 3/1/2018

Billy Joe Armstrong, Jr. A/K/A Billy Joe Armstrong A/K/A Billy Armstrong A/K/A Bradley Nelson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that collection proceedings reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard must be limited to the issues raised before Appeals
  • holding that collection proceedings reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard must be limited to the issues raised before Appeals
  • holding that the Court does not have jurisdiction to consider section 6330(c)(2) issues that were not raised before the Appeals Office
  • holding that the Court does not have jurisdiction to consider sec. 6330(c)(2) ↩ issues that were not raised before the Appeals Office
  • holding that the Court does not have jurisdiction to consider section 6330(c)(2) issues that were not raised before the Appeals Office
  • holding that review of collection determinations for abuse of discretion must be limited to issues raised before Appeals

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.