Billy H. Nappier, Mary J. Nappier, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellants v. Allstate Insurance Company, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an uncontradicted affidavit of the insurer’s representative, stating that the insurer would not have issued a policy had it known the truth, was sufficient to preclude any genuine issue of material fact, and thus summary judgment as to materiality was proper
• holding that an uncontradicted affidavit of the insurer’s representative, stating that the insurer would not have issued a policy had it known the truth, was sufficient to preclude any genuine issue of material fact, and thus summary judgment as to materiality was proper
• affirming grant of summary judgment because evidence that policy would not have been issued was not controverted
• affirming trial court’s grant of summary judgment when evidence before court was affidavit of insurance company’s underwriting manager attesting that policy would not have been issued had it known true facts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).