Bills v. Arizona State Board of Education

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a party may waive substantive issues by failing to file a cross-appeal
• concluding no remand was necessary where issues could be disposed of through summary judgment because they presented “only questions of law which we are able to resolve by statutory interpretation”
• recognizing a party may waive substantive issues by failing to file a cross-appeal
• declining to remand and addressing two issues “left untouched by the superior court” because they could be “resolve[d] by statutory interpretation” and “no genuine issues as to any material facts” remained
• appellee may not raise issue attacking judgment in absence of a cross-appeal
• no due-process violation where no prejudice occurred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).