Bill's Coal Co. v. Board of Public Utilities of Springfield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[a] delay that occurred because the government litigated a position that lacked substantial justification is not a permissible special factor because any litigation eligible for EAJA fees, by definition, involves the government’s pursuit of an unjustified position.”
• remanding “for additional consideration and, if necessary, recalculation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).