Billman v. State of Maryland Deposit Insurance Fund Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the concept of set-off is embraced within the scope of claims permitted under Rule 2-381
• stating that because no “exceptions [were] taken after the jury had been charged” the Court could not consider the alleged error in the jury instruction
• relying on State v. Hogg, 311 Md. 446, 465-66, 535 A.2d 923 (1988)
• “a subsequent statute purporting to declare the intent of an earlier one might be of great weight in assisting a court when in doubt”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).