Billiot v. Greenburg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “communications between an insured and his counsel that pertain to the common interest held by the insured and the insurer — i.e. the defense of the claim — are available to the insurer and this right of access would continue even if their interests became adverse.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).