Billington v. Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that four months between protected activity and retaliatory act was likely too much to support an inference of causal connection
• concluding that four months between protected activity and retaliatory act was likely too much to support an inference of causal connection
• holding that the close proximity between plaintiff’s return from disability leave and her termination satisfies the causal element to establish a prima facie case of retaliation
• noting that “the plaintiffs did not meet their burden to establish pretext because, among other things, the plaintiffs’ prima facie case was weak”
• finding that a gap of “several days” between the protected activity and the adverse action was sufficient to satisfy the causal element to establish a prima facie case of ADA retaliation
• noting that requesting a reasonable accommodation of a disability is an ADA-protected activity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).