Billingslea v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[I]t would be a usurpation of our powers to add language to a statute where the legislature has failed to do so.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Billingslea v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-11-22· cited 48×
• Thomas v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2011-05-17

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Bowden v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-03-03· cited 404×
• Dickey v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-10-31· cited 161×
• Rose v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1986-12-01· cited 74×
• Joslin v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1986-12-01· cited 48×
• Mary L. Jones v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1962-08-09· cited 42×
• Ronk v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-12-01· cited 39×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-01-16· cited 25×
• Lang v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-09-19· cited 15×