Billings v. Illinois
Citations
- 188 U.S. 97
- 23 S. Ct. 272
- 47 L. Ed. 400
- 1903 U.S. LEXIS 1270
Syllabus
<p>The claim that section 2 of theact providing for the taxation of life estates, as construed by the highest courts of the State of Illinois, is in contravention of the Fourteenth Amendment in that the classification of life tenants is arbitrary and unreasonable and denies to life tenants the equal protection of laws because it taxes one class of life estates where the remainder is to lineals and expressly exempts life estates where the remainder is to collaterals or to strangers in blood, cannot be sustained.</p> <p>Inheritance tax laws are based upon the power of a State over testate and intestate dispositions of property, to limit and create estates, and to impose conditions upon their, transfer or devolution. This court has already decided in regard to this law that such power could be exercised by distinguishing between the lineal and collateral relatives of a testator, Whether the amount of the tax depends upon him who immediately receives, or upon him who ultimately receives, makes no difference with the power of the State. No discrimination being exercised in the creation of the class, equality is observed. Magoim v. Illinois Trust and Savings Bank, 170 U.'S. 283, followed.</p>
Judges: McKenna
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- The People v. McCabeIllinois Supreme Court· 1971-10-15· cited 201×
- Michigan Central Railroad v. PowersSupreme Court· 1906-04-02· cited 123×
- Chanler v. KelseySupreme Court· 1907-04-15· cited 117×
- Citizens' Telephone Co. of Grand Rapids v. FullerSupreme Court· 1913-06-10· cited 114×
- District of Columbia v. BrookeSupreme Court· 1909-05-17· cited 106×
- Watson v. State Comptroller of NYSupreme Court· 1920-11-15· cited 70×
- Commonwealth v. Kentucky Jockey ClubCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1931-03-03· cited 59×
- Frick's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1923-04-30· cited 42×
- Salomon v. State Tax Comm'n of NYSupreme Court· 1929-02-18· cited 40×
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. SimonSupreme Court of Florida· 1908-06-15· cited 40×
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. CoachmanSupreme Court of Florida· 1910-01-15· cited 27×
- Walker v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1936-03-30· cited 26×
- Thompson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1908-04-06· cited 21×
- Bank of Texas v. ChildsCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1981-01-23· cited 17×
- Frost-Pack Distributing Co. v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court· 1977-05-02· cited 16×
- Coy v. LinderSupreme Court of Georgia· 1936-11-25· cited 15×
- Axelbank v. RonyNinth Circuit· 1960-04-25· cited 14×
- State ex rel. Rolston v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri· 1912-12-10· cited 14×
- United States Cold Storage Corp. v. Detroit Board of AssessorsMichigan Supreme Court· 1957-07-31· cited 13×
- City of Jackson v. Mississippi Fire Ins.Mississippi Supreme Court· 1923-03-15· cited 12×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.