Skip to main content
· 1/19/1903

Billings v. Illinois

Citations

  • 188 U.S. 97
  • 23 S. Ct. 272
  • 47 L. Ed. 400
  • 1903 U.S. LEXIS 1270

Syllabus

<p>The claim that section 2 of theact providing for the taxation of life estates, as construed by the highest courts of the State of Illinois, is in contravention of the Fourteenth Amendment in that the classification of life tenants is arbitrary and unreasonable and denies to life tenants the equal protection of laws because it taxes one class of life estates where the remainder is to lineals and expressly exempts life estates where the remainder is to collaterals or to strangers in blood, cannot be sustained.</p> <p>Inheritance tax laws are based upon the power of a State over testate and intestate dispositions of property, to limit and create estates, and to impose conditions upon their, transfer or devolution. This court has already decided in regard to this law that such power could be exercised by distinguishing between the lineal and collateral relatives of a testator, Whether the amount of the tax depends upon him who immediately receives, or upon him who ultimately receives, makes no difference with the power of the State. No discrimination being exercised in the creation of the class, equality is observed. Magoim v. Illinois Trust and Savings Bank, 170 U.'S. 283, followed.</p>

Judges: McKenna

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.