Supreme Court of Connecticut· 6/22/2004
Biller Associates v. Peterken
Citations
- 269 Conn. 716
- 849 A.2d 847
- 2004 Conn. LEXIS 236
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In the eases in which this court has, as a matter of law, refused to recognize a fiduciary relationship, the parties were [] dealing at arm’s length[.]”
- “The Rules [of Professional Conduct] are designed to provide guidance to lawyers and to provide a structure for regulating conduct through disciplinary agencies. They are not designed to be a basis for civil liability ” [Internal quotation marks omitted.]
- “A fiduciary or confidential relationship is characterized by a unique degree of trust and confidence between the parties, one of whom has superior knowledge, skill or expertise and is under a duty to represent the interests of the other.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Palmer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Glazer v. Dress Barn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-06-07· cited 98×
- Sherwood v. Danbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-05-16· cited 32×
- Accident & Injury Medical Specialists, P.C. v. MintzSupreme Court of Colorado· 2012-06-25· cited 29×
- Hutchinson v. Farm Family Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-03-01· cited 26×
- Mintz v. Accident & Injury Medical Specialists, PCColorado Court of Appeals· 2010-11-10· cited 22×
- SLSJ, LLC v. KlebanD. Connecticut· 2017-09-29· cited 16×
- In Re Bayou Hedge Funds Investment LitigationS.D. New York· 2007-01-18· cited 14×
- Atkinson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-12-21· cited 14×
- Iacurci v. SaxConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-12-04· cited 11×
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. WindhamConnecticut Appellate Court· 2013-11-26· cited 11×
- Lahaina Fashions, Inc. v. Bank of Hawai‘i.Hawaii Supreme Court· 2014-01-07· cited 9×
- O'Neil v. New Eng. Rd., Inc. (In re Neri Bros. Constr. Corp.)D. Connecticut· 2018-09-27· cited 9×
- Rosenblit v. LascheverConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-06-23· cited 8×
- Gough v. Saint Peter's Episcopal ChurchConnecticut Appellate Court· 2013-07-02· cited 4×
- Saye v. Old Hill Partners, Inc.D. Connecticut· 2007-03-12· cited 3×
- Christine Falls Corp. v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nSecond Circuit· 2013-09-19· cited 2×
- Levinson v. Westport National BankD. Connecticut· 2012-09-28· cited 2×
- Broad-Bussel Family LP. v. Bayou Group LLCS.D. New York· 2007-01-18· cited 1×
- Barlow v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2014-06-10
- Saint Bernard School of Montville, Inc. v. Bank of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2014-08-05
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. R. G. Whipple, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-06-08· cited 274×
- Mozzochi v. BeckSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-07-28· cited 240×
- Hi-Ho Tower, Inc. v. Com-Tronics, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-12-12· cited 170×
- Noble v. MarshallConnecticut Appellate Court· 1990-09-11· cited 60×
- Dugan v. Mobile Medical Testing Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-09-23· cited 32×
- Biller Associates v. PeterkenConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-05-30· cited 13×
- Standish v. Sotavento Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2000-07-18· cited 11×
- Biller Associates v. PeterkenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-09-27· cited 1×
Other cases named Biller Associates v. Peterken
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.