Bill Vangilder v. Brian Baker, City of Lafayette, and Lafayette Police Department

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff’s § 1983 suit was not barred by Heck in part because it didn’t “challenge the factual basis presented at his change of plea hearing”
• holding that the plaintiffs § 1983 suit was not barred by Heck in part because it didn’t “challenge the factual basis presented at his change of plea hearing”
• holding that claims for excessive force are not barred by Heck
• holding Heck did not apply where the plaintiff did not “collaterally attack his conviction, . . . or challenge the factual basis presented at his change of plea hearing”
• holding Heck did not apply where the plaintiff did not “collaterally attack his conviction, . . . or challenge the factual basis presented at his change of plea hearing”
• applying Heck requires trial court to \analyze the relationship between plaintiff's [42 U.S.C.] § 1983 claim and the charge on which he was convicted\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).