Bill Grunder's Sons Construction, Inc. v. Ganzer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating a nonmovant must file a motion under Iowa Rule of Civil Procedure 1.904 after the grant of summary judgment to preserve its unaddressed arguments for appeal
• requiring postjudgment motion to preserve error for appellate review of unresisted summary judgment
• “Based upon considerations of fairness, this 10 court is not ordinarily a clearinghouse for claims which were not raised in the district court.” (cleaned up)
• “[T]he nonmovant must at least preserve error by filing a motion following entry of [the unresisted summary] judgment, allowing the district court to consider the claim of deficiency.”
• “[T]he nonmovant must at least preserve error by filing a motion following entry of [the unresisted summary] judgment, allowing the district court to consider the claim of deficiency.”
• “[I]f the movant has failed to establish its [summary judgment] claim and the court nevertheless enters judgment, the nonmovant must at least preserve error by filing a motion following entry of judgment, allowing the district court to consider the claim of deficiency.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).