Bill Duncan & a. v. State of New Hampshire & a.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the petitioner’s claim that a program would result in “net fiscal losses” to local governments does not articulate a personal injury sufficient to confer standing (quotation omitted)
• explaining that “judicial power in this State is limited to deciding actual, and not hypothetical cases”
• observing that, generally, standing “requires parties to have personal legal or equitable rights that are adverse to one another, with regard to an actual, not hypothetical, dispute, which is capable of judicial redress” (citations omitted)
• explaining that \standing is a question of subject matter jurisdiction\
• explaining that \standing is a question of subject matter jurisdiction\
• explaining that “standing is a question of subject matter jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).