Bill Conroy v. Scott Thompson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “this means that the petitioner must provide evidence establishing that his mental issues actually impaired his ability to pursue his claims throughout the limitations period.”
• “[S]uch tolling is . . . reserved for those circumstances ‘far beyond the litigant’s control.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Berman Justus, Jr. v. Harold Clarke
  Fourth Circuit· 2023-08-15· cited 57×
• DeWayne Perry v. Richard Brown
  Seventh Circuit· 2020-02-12· cited 33×
• William Clyde Gibson III v. Ron Neal
  Seventh Circuit· 2026-03-31

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Thomas Socha v. Gary Boughton
  Seventh Circuit· 2014-08-14· cited 196×
• Miller v. Runyon
  Seventh Circuit· 1996-02-26· cited 160×
• Joseph Lombardo v. United States
  Seventh Circuit· 2017-06-20· cited 135×
• Charles J. Mayberry v. Michael A. Dittmann
  Seventh Circuit· 2018-09-14· cited 132×
• Obriecht v. Foster
  Seventh Circuit· 2013-08-16· cited 92×
• Jerome Davis v. Bob Humphreys
  Seventh Circuit· 2014-04-01· cited 55×
• Pavlovsky, Gilbert W v. VanNatta, John R.
  Seventh Circuit· 2005-12-16· cited 45×

Other cases named Bill Conroy v. Scott Thompson

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Bill Conroy v. Scott Thompson
  Seventh Circuit· 2019-07-11