Bill Clark Herbert Futch Austin Hurst Louis Sliker and William Barrineau v. Coats & Clark, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144 (1970) and Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986)
• \Even after Celotex it is never enough simply to state that the non-moving party cannot meet its burden at trial.\
• “it is never enough simply to state that the non-moving party cannot meet its burden at trial”
• “[I]t is never enough simply to state that the non-moving party cannot meet its burden at trial.”
• “It is the general rule, of course, that a federal appellate court does not consider an issue not passed upon below.” (quoting Singleton v. Wulff, 428 U.S. 106, 120 (1976))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).